I could NOT buy one, so I made one.
by John
A few of my first degree relatives have ADD or ADHD. I have never been officially diagnosed as such, but I know that I have similar characteristics. Like jumping from one project to another. Or suddenly shifting topics of conversation, sometimes to the discomfiture of to whomsoever I am talking. (I will not end a sentence with a preposition. It is something up with which I will not put.- apology to Winston Churchill, I think).
The latest examples are the ropewalk, the CNC mill, and the CNC seizing serving machine. My readers must wonder “where to today?”
Well, I decided that I need more deadeyes for my model Constitution.

So, I have ADDishly shifted my thoughts from seizing serving and ropemaking, to making deadeyes.
I searched YouTube, and the model ship building sites, and my model ship building books for information on the subject.
There was much advice on how to make model deadeyes, laboriously, slowly, and not very satisfactorily, IMO.
I want to use my CNC mill and/or CNC lathe to churn out hundreds of them, at least SEMI automatically, if not TOTALLY automatically.
My thoughts to date are that…….
1. A block of wood (walnut or similar) is machined to size to make say 100 deadeyes (or maybe 500.)
2. The holes for all of the deadeyes (that would be 300 holes) are CNC drilled. (I reckon that would take 3-5 seconds per hole, say 5″ altogether, estimated.)
3. The round edge of the deadeyes is cut with an annular cutter (more of that later), say 2-3″ plus time for tool change.
4. Somehow, the circumferential groove is machined. Probably in a lathe, and probably one at a time. Much slower, maybe a minute for each deadeye. Workholding is the main issue, but I have thoughts on that subject.
5. Then the edges are rounded. ahah! I have an easy solution for that. Maybe another 10″. Watch this space. No announcement until the idea is tested.
SO that is the plan. Yes, I should just pay someone else. But, I have set the idea in motion, so I will continue.
For several days I have trawled Ebay, Temu, Banggood, and my local wood workers retailer looking for an annular cutter which will leave a 5mm diameter center. The smallest I could find had a 0.25″/6.35mm center. Too big. Plus, if my idea works, I will want even smaller annular cutters.
So, I made one.
Firstly I found some 8mm diameter hardened steel rod about 100mm long, and I drilled a 5mm hole through it lengthways. It was slow drilling, using a cobalt drill, and plenty of lubricant, but it worked. Maybe it was just case hardened.
The gentle giant German, Stefan Gotteswinter, recently posted a YT video about making a 1.6mm diameter annular cutter so I just followed his suggestions. Incidentally, anyone who is interested in expert precision machining should subscribe to Stefan. His English is better than most native English speakers. And his work is sublime.
Then I hardened and tempered the ends of the tube.


And the result, as you can see, works pretty well. Those deadeye blanks are 4.6mm diameter and 3.5mm deep. The wood is Western Australian Jarrah, which is a nice, tight, dense Australian hardwood. I will try it for the deadeyes.
I used the annular cutter about 100 times, to refine speeds and feeds, and it seemed as sharp at the last one as the first.
While I had the T&C grinder set up, I cut similar teeth at the other end of the annular cutter tube.
So, all excited, I turned on the CNC mill (the big one), but was very disappointed when the computer would not boot up. So, I could not drill the deadeye faces. I think that the computer has died. It is about 20 years old. The LCD screen has been leaking for over a year, and it has been misbehaving for a while… probably hard drive dying, so I am not going to try to fix it.
Another decision. Do I machine the wood blanks to the same thickness as the deadeyes? or thicker, as in the above photo, then saw the off the deadeyes.

It is too hot today to go to my workshop, so installing another computer will have to wait for cooler weather.
We are experiencing the hottest summer on record here in southern Oz. Please note, Mr. President Elect.

I like your dedication to the finer details in the model. The first thought I had for automating as much of the dead eye production was along the lines of Stuarts production of hand wheels on his lathe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point Brendan. I will talk to Stuart, although he denies all knowledge regarding woodworking!
LikeLike
I was in a make-everything mood, 20 odd years ago now, and made several Imperial/Standard/inch counterbores which were just like your annular cutter, but with a central non-cutting spigot/pilot. Larger ones had a removable pilot. The commercial ones were horrendously expensive, and were hard to find with exactly the dimensions I wanted. Most were for a n extremely loose fit.
I used drill rod (silver steel) and filed the teeth. Not pretty but not hard to make and they really do an excellent job. I usually cut metal rather than wood.
I have also used annular cutters as a turning tool placed in the tailstock, so you can turn relatively long small diameter features, the hole providing support. Not sure what the official term for such a tool is. “Box tool” comes to mind, and it’s basically the same principle, but I don’t think it’s the official name.
As a metal guy, my first thought on making the deadeyes would be to start with round stock, rather than flat. I would have turned the circumferential features, then parted off, leaving only the holes to be drilled. I try to avoid having to hold tiny pieces for turning-type operations and prefer them still attached to a big piece of stock.
But can you even find decent round wood stock? How were the full-size ones made? I understand wood has something called “grain”…
Anyhow, I’m enjoying your posts; there’s always something to learn from the problem solving of others.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thankyou for your very interesting letter.
I started with wood, making furniture, including a staircase, a long case clock; then moved to metalworking for a couple of decades, including CNC, and recently a pleasant return to wood while making Constitution. I do find that skills learned with one medium often provide solutions when working with other media, And I always learn from odd trades and professionals. I ask my dentist about his grinders, my ophthalmologist about his magnifying instruments. Even gynaecology has provided some solutions to model ship building.
Regarding using round stock for model deadeyes. That is the traditional method, and the reason the eyes are often misplaced. And my reason for keeping the deadeyes attached to the big stock as long as possible. Either the drilling, or the circumferential turning has to be done on the tiny part. I have chosen to favour the drilling by doing it first.
Full size blocks and deadeyes were originally made, laboriously and slowly, by hand. Then the father of Isambard Kingdom Brunel made the family fortune by inventing a number of machines to automate the process. Making a lot of money and reducing the workforce required exponentially.
Personally I believe that the answer lies in CNC machinery. But we will see.
John.
LikeLike
I saw your next post after I commented. As a retired CNC repair guy, I was going to suggest that live tooling on a CNC lathe (AKA mill turning) was the way to do it in a single operation (almost), avoiding working on tiny parts, but I thought there would be little relevance to the hobbyist world – until I saw the next post. Good job!
I am currently (meaning occasionally) working on a benchtop CNC lathe, which is basically a Taig but with a BLDC spindle motor and small servo axis motors. A live tooling capability is definitely in the plans, but probably not soon, unfortunately. I had very good luck using the Taig mill for CNC, hence the choice. It’s built like a tank for such a small inexpensive tool.
Jed
LikeLike
I am as usual enjoying your posts.
Looking at the deadeyes they appear to be rounded over and wonder if it may be possible to create a dish-ended cutter rather than annular. If so the parts could be rounded over in the block.
Could be totally wrong but just my 2 cents worth.
John B
LikeLike